What You Need to Know About Temporary Agency Workers

Temporary agency workers are people hired by a staffing or temp agency and then sent to work at another company — called the host employer. They do the same jobs as permanent staff, often side by side, but with less pay, fewer benefits, and far less job security.

Here is a quick snapshot of what defines temporary agency work:

This setup is called a dual-employer relationship, and it creates real confusion about your rights — especially when something goes wrong.

One anonymous temp worker put it plainly: staffing agencies treat temporary workers as expendable, and because they can easily replace them, worker safety and dignity often fall through the cracks.

If you’ve experienced unpaid wages, unsafe conditions, discrimination, or sudden loss of work — you are not alone, and you do have rights.

Infographic showing dual-employer relationship between staffing agency, temp worker, and host employer infographic

When you walk into a workplace as a temporary agency worker, you might feel like a guest in someone else’s house. But legally, you aren’t just a guest. You are protected by a web of state and federal laws designed to ensure you aren’t exploited. Under the law, temporary agency workers operate within a “dual-employer” framework. This means both your primary employer (the staffing agency) and your secondary employer (the host company) share legal responsibilities for your employment.

Understanding this relationship is key to protecting yourself. Your primary employer handles your paycheck, taxes, and workers’ compensation insurance, while your secondary employer directs your day-to-day tasks and controls your physical work environment.

To dig deeper into what this means for your daily work life, read our guide on Your Rights as a Temporary Worker and weigh the trade-offs of this setup by exploring The Pros and Cons of Temporary Work.

Defining Temporary Agency Workers vs. Direct Hires

It is easy to get confused by the alphabet soup of modern employment: direct hires, temp workers, independent contractors, and gig workers. Let’s break down the differences:

In California, the distinction between a true temporary employee and an independent contractor is strictly enforced. If a host company treats you like an employee but calls you an independent contractor to avoid paying benefits or payroll taxes, you may be misclassified. To find out where you stand, check out our article: Are You a Temporary Worker or a Misclassified Employee?.

Temp Agency vs. Staffing Agency: Key Differences

While people often use the terms interchangeably, there are distinct operational differences between a standard temp agency and a broader staffing agency. Choosing the right one depends on your immediate and long-term career goals.

Diagram showing the operational differences between temp agencies and staffing agencies

Feature Temporary Agency Staffing Agency
Primary Focus Immediate, short-term coverage (seasonal peaks, vacation coverage) Broad spectrum (short-term, long-term, temp-to-hire, direct hire)
Typical Duration Days to a few months Months, years, or permanent
Common Roles Entry-level, administrative, manual labor, events Professional, technical, industrial, healthcare, managerial
Employer of Record Almost always the temporary agency The agency (for contract roles) or the client (for direct hire)
Conversion Fees Standard if the client wants to hire the worker early Pre-negotiated transition terms and direct-hire placement fees

If you need fast cash or a highly flexible schedule, a temporary agency is excellent for plugging employment gaps. If you are looking to build a career or transition into a permanent role, a staffing agency that offers temp-to-hire or direct-hire placements is usually the better route.

Joint Employer Responsibilities and Workplace Safety

One of the most dangerous myths in the staffing world is that host employers do not have to worry about the safety of temporary workers because “they belong to the agency.” This is completely false.

Under federal law, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) views the staffing agency and the host employer as joint employers. This means both share the legal duty to keep you safe. Host employers cannot contract away their safety liabilities, and staffing agencies cannot blindly trust that a host site is safe.

For a comprehensive breakdown of these federal standards, you can read the official guidance on Protecting Temporary Workers | Occupational Safety and Health Administration .

Warehouse safety training session with a supervisor instructing temporary agency workers

Safety Training and Liability for Temporary Agency Workers

How is safety split in practice? Think of it as a team effort:

  1. The Staffing Agency (Primary Employer): Must provide general safety and health training. They must also actively inquire about the hazards at the host employer’s site, conduct site visits, and ensure the host company is providing a safe environment. Ignorance of hazards is not a legal defense for the agency.
  2. The Host Employer (Secondary Employer): Must provide site-specific and task-specific safety training. They must train you on the exact machinery you will use, provide proper personal protective equipment (PPE), and include you in all safety briefings.

Under California’s strict Cal/OSHA rules, every employer must maintain a written Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) under Title 8 Section 3203. If a staffing agency knows a host site is unsafe and fails to pull its workers or demand corrections, the agency can be cited and fined alongside the host employer.

If you are currently working on a temporary assignment in California, make sure to read our practical Tips for Temporary Workers in California to protect your health and safety on the job.

Equal treatment is a fundamental human right, but in many parts of the world, it is also a strict legal requirement for temporary agency workers. While the United States is still catching up in some areas, international standards provide a powerful blueprint for what fair treatment should look like.

In Europe, for example, the landmark Directive – 2008/104 – EN – EUR-Lex establishes the principle of equal treatment. This directive mandates that temporary agency workers must receive the same basic working and employment conditions (such as pay, working hours, and rest periods) as if they had been recruited directly by the host company from day one.

Furthermore, countries like Ireland enforce these rights under local laws, which you can explore on the Agency workers information page. These laws ensure that temporary workers have equal access to collective facilities like company canteens, childcare centers, and transport services.

The 12-Week Qualifying Period and International Standards

A key feature of international temp worker protections is the prevention of artificial structural loopholes. In the United Kingdom, The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 introduce a 12-week qualifying period. After working 12 continuous weeks in the same role with the same hirer, a temporary worker is legally entitled to the exact same pay and holiday benefits as a permanent peer.

To prevent companies from simply firing and rehiring workers to reset this clock, strict anti-avoidance measures are detailed in the statutory framework, which you can read in full via the official 105792COVS document. These rules ensure that short breaks or minor role adjustments do not break the continuity of your qualifying period.

California Labor Laws and Temp Worker Protections

While California does not have a strict “12-week equal pay” statute like the UK, we have some of the strongest labor protections in the United States. Under the California Labor Code, temporary agency workers are entitled to:

If your agency or host employer is violating these basic rights, you don’t have to take it lying down. Learn more by reading What You Need to Know as a Temporary Employee in California.

Challenges, Discrimination, and Legislative Victories

Despite these legal protections, temporary agency workers face systemic hurdles. Academic research, such as the study Producing Precarity: The Temporary Staffing Agency in the Labor Market | Qualitative Sociology | Springer Nature Link , reveals how some staffing agencies systematically cultivate and reproduce structural vulnerability. By keeping a large “periphery” of underutilized workers on their books, agencies can maximize their profits while keeping workers in a state of constant insecurity and compliance.

This precarity is not felt equally. It is deeply tied to issues of race, immigration status, and occupational segregation.

A diverse group of temporary agency workers working safely in a logistics and distribution facility

Overrepresentation and Safety Risks in Blue-Collar Roles

The data paints a stark picture of who carries the heaviest burdens in the temporary staffing industry:

These high-risk industries — industrial/warehouse placements make up roughly 36% of all staffing placements — are where safety hazards and wage violations are most heavily concentrated.

Recent Legislative Victories: Bills of Rights

In response to these systemic inequalities, workers and advocates have won major legislative victories across the country.

In New Jersey, the Temporary Workers’ Bill of Rights went into effect, mandating that temporary workers in key occupational groups receive the same average pay and benefits as permanent employees performing the same work.

Similarly, the Illinois Temp Worker Fairness and Safety Act has placed strict transparency and safety training requirements on agencies and host employers alike.

While California does not yet have a single, unified “Temp Worker Bill of Rights,” our existing joint-employment doctrines, strict Cal/OSHA enforcement, and robust anti-discrimination laws provide powerful legal tools to fight back against exploitation.

Transitioning to Permanent Employment and Choosing Credible Agencies

For many, temporary work is a stepping stone. A “temp-to-hire” arrangement allows you to showcase your skills on the job with the goal of transitioning to a permanent, direct-hire role.

However, this transition is often blocked by “permatemping” — a practice where host employers keep workers in temporary status indefinitely to avoid paying benefits. This is often enforced through contracts between the agency and the host company containing restrictive “conversion fees” that penalize the host employer for hiring you directly before a certain timeframe (such as 180 days) has passed.

Evaluating and Choosing a Credible Temporary Agency

To avoid exploitative agencies, you must know how to vet them before you sign on the dotted line. Here are the actionable steps you should take:

Frequently Asked Questions about Temp Staffing

Navigating the temp world can leave you with a lot of questions. Here are the answers to some of the most common queries we hear from workers.

Can a temporary agency worker transition to a permanent role?

Yes. Many placements are structured as temp-to-hire. However, host employers are often bound by contract clauses requiring them to pay the staffing agency a conversion fee if they hire you permanently before a set period. Always ask your agency recruiter about these timelines so you can plan your career progression transparently.

Who is liable if a temporary worker is injured on the job?

Under the dual-employer doctrine, both the staffing agency and the host employer share responsibility. Generally, your medical bills and lost wages will be covered by the staffing agency’s workers’ compensation insurance. However, if the host employer’s severe negligence caused your injury, or if Cal/OSHA finds safety violations, the host employer can face heavy citations and fines.

What rights do temporary workers have against discrimination and retaliation?

You have the exact same rights as permanent employees. Under federal law (Title VII) and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), it is strictly illegal for either the staffing agency or the host employer to discriminate against you based on race, gender, age, religion, disability, or sexual orientation. Furthermore, if you report a safety hazard or unpaid wages, both employers are legally prohibited from retaliating against you (such as firing you, cutting your hours, or “ghosting” you on future assignments).

Conclusion

Temporary agency workers are the backbone of California’s most vital industries, from logistics in the Central Valley to manufacturing in the Bay Area. But flexibility should never come at the cost of your safety, your dignity, or your hard-earned wages.

At Aiman-Smith & Marcy, we are a boutique, Oakland-based law firm specializing in employment law. Our close-knit, collaborative team of attorneys has worked together for over 25 years, fighting tirelessly for workers facing discrimination, unpaid wages, and unlawful workplace practices. We understand the complex joint-employer relationships that define temporary work, and we know how to hold both agencies and host employers accountable.

If you believe your rights have been violated, or if you suspect you have been misclassified, we are here to help. Contact us today for a confidential consultation, and let’s discuss how we can stand up for your rights together. To get started, read our guide: Are You a Temporary Worker or a Misclassified Employee?.

Lisseth Bayona

Attorney

Education and Background

I am a Los Angeles native and daughter of Salvadorian immigrants. From an early age, my parents instilled the value of hard work and education in me and my two siblings. Their perseverance enabled each of us to graduate from college and earn professional degrees.

My interest and commitment to workers’ rights have roots in my parents’ experiences as undocumented workers in Los Angeles. Witnessing the challenges they faced inspired me to pursue a career where I can help individuals confronted with similar struggles. To help someone in those moments is very satisfying. I love connecting with people and learning about their stories. I believe that dignity in the workplace is a right of all workers, not a convenience or privilege reserved for employees of a certain race, gender, age, sexual orientation, or gender identity.

Legal Experience

I received my J.D. from the University of Southern California (USC) Gould School of Law. While there, I served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Patrick J. Walsh of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Also, while at Gould, I served as an extern for the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, Criminal Division. As an extern, I worked closely with a trial team of Assistant U.S. Attorneys in prosecution of a web-based platform used to promote human trafficking.

I am a member of Aiman-Smith & Marcy’s class action litigation group. As part of that team, I have successfully fought high-stakes legal battles against well-resourced and highly competent defense firms. See, e.g., Cal. Labor & Workforce Dev. Agency ex rel. Raymond v. CompuCom Sys. (E.D.Cal. Mar. 9, 2023, No. 2:21-cv-02327-KJM-KLN) 2023 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 40710.

Personal Interests

In my free time, I enjoy urban vegetable gardening, traveling, and spending time with my nephew and niece. I also love to spend time at San Onofre Beach learning to surf, although admittedly, I am not very good.

Education

 

Hallie L. Von Rock

Abogada (SBN 233152)

Educación y Antecedentes

Me mudé a la zona de la bahía desde Washington después de graduarme en el instituto. Me aceptaron en la UC Berkeley a través de un programa en el que podía aplazar dos años mientras obtenía mi residencia en California y asistía a la universidad comunitaria, lo cual era significativo ya que estaba pagando la universidad por mi cuenta. Empecé a trabajar para Randall Aiman-Smith y Reed Marcy en 1996 como encargada de la oficina mientras tomaba clases nocturnas. Mi primera incursión en el mundo legal fue poco después de empezar en el bufete, cuando estaba preparada para transferirme a la UC Berkeley. En lugar de aceptar mi condición de residente, la Junta de Regentes adoptó la posición de que la residencia de California requería que un estudiante estuviera en California “dos años naturales”. Randall y Reed se ocuparon de mi caso con el mismo brío con el que ayudaban a sus clientes reales y tuve la oportunidad de peinar la biblioteca de la UC Berkeley para leer sus códigos y reglamentos para apoyar mi posición. En esa experiencia, aprendí lo que era sentirse indefenso frente a una gran organización y luego tener abogados dedicados en mi rincón para defender mi causa.

Tras una pausa para estudiar historia del arte, fui a la Facultad de Derecho de la UC Hastings y seguí trabajando con Randall y Reed. Después de haber trabajado juntos durante 25 años, tenemos una capacidad única para trabajar en colaboración y terminar las frases del otro. Me he esforzado a lo largo de mi carrera para hacer una diferencia en la vida de nuestros clientes. Al final del día, si estoy ayudando a alguien a obtener una compensación por las pérdidas que sufrió, entonces sé que todo el trabajo realizado en un caso ha valido la pena.

Experiencia legal

Tengo amplia experiencia en litigios civiles y casos de acciones colectivas, incluyendo la realización de descubrimiento y deposiciones, el cálculo de análisis de daños, la preparación de mociones para la certificación, la redacción de documentos de apelación, y la supervisión de la administración de las reclamaciones. Hemos llevado varias demandas colectivas contra minoristas en las que los demandantes alegaban que se les obligaba a comprar ropa para ir a trabajar y no se les compensaba por estas compras, incluso contra Abercrombie & Fitch, Hugo Boss, Armani Exchange, Uniqlo, Dollar Tree y Ross. Recientemente, fui abogado litigante en una demanda por difamación contra el Bank of America en nombre de una ex empleada que afirmaba que el Banco la había puesto en una lista negra con futuros empleadores. El jurado encontró al Bank of America responsable, incluso por daños punitivos.

Intereses personales

Aiman-Smith & Marcy me ha patrocinado en el Maratón de Boston y en el Maratón de Nueva York. Cuando corro, suelo llevar una camiseta “Rockstar Ronan” para apoyar la investigación del cáncer infantil a través de la Fundación Ronan Thompson.

Educación

Universidad de California, Berkeley, licenciatura, 1999

Facultad de Derecho Hastings, Universidad de California, J.D., 2004

Hallie L. Von Rock

Attorney (SBN 233152)

Education and Background

I moved to the Bay Area from Washington after graduating high school. I had been accepted to UC Berkeley through a program where I could defer for two years while getting my California residency and attending community college, which was significant since I was paying for college on my own. I began working for Randall Aiman-Smith and Reed Marcy in 1996 as an office manager while taking night classes. My first foray into the legal world was soon after starting at the firm when I was ready to transfer to UC Berkeley. Rather than accepting my resident status, the Board of Regents took the position that California residency required a student to be in California “two calendar years.” Randall and Reed took up my case with the same verve as they helped their actual clients and I got the chance to comb through the UC Berkeley library to read their codes and regulations to support my position. In that experience, I learned what is was like to feel helpless against a big organization and then to have dedicated attorneys in my corner to take up my cause.

After a break to pursue my major in art history, I went to UC Hastings College of Law and continued working with Randall and Reed. Having worked together now for over 25 years, we have a unique ability to work collaboratively and finish each other’s sentences. I have strived throughout my career to make a difference in the lives of our clients. At the end of the day, if I am helping someone to get compensation for losses they suffered, then I know that all the work put into a case has been worth it.

Legal Experience

I have extensive experience in civil litigation and class action cases, including conducting discovery and depositions, calculating damages analysis, preparing motions for certification, writing appellate documents, and overseeing claims administration. We have handled several class actions against retailers where plaintiffs claimed they were forced to purchase clothing to wear to work and were not compensated for these purchases, including against Abercrombie & Fitch, Hugo Boss, Armani Exchange, Uniqlo, Dollar Tree, and Ross. Recently, I was trial counsel in a defamation claim against Bank of America on behalf of a former employee who claimed the Bank blacklisted her with future employers. The jury found Bank of America liable, including for punitive damages.

Personal Interests

Aiman-Smith & Marcy has sponsored me in the Boston Marathon and New York Marathon. When I race, I often wear a “Rockstar Ronan” shirt to support research for childhood cancer through The Ronan Thompson Foundation.

Education

University of California, Berkeley, B.A., 1999

Hastings College of the Law, University of California, J.D., 2004

Randall Aiman-Smith

Abogado (SBN 124599)

Aiman-Smith & Marcy. Oakland consumer fraud attorneys.

Educación y antecedentes

Fui afortunado. A pesar de no haber terminado la escuela secundaria o la universidad, pude -aunque con mucho trabajo- ser admitido y sobresalir en una de las mejores escuelas de derecho del país: La Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Berkeley. Mientras estuve allí, tuve el privilegio de ser editor de la California Law Review y miembro del Moot Court Board, asesorando en la redacción de escritos y en la defensa de apelaciones a otros estudiantes. Después de salir de la escuela de derecho, en mis primeros años de práctica, enseñé la escritura legal y la defensa de apelación en la Universidad de California, Hastings College of the Law. También, a lo largo de los años, he sido presentador en eventos de educación legal continua.

Experiencia legal

He sido abogado durante 35 años. He dedicado mi práctica exclusivamente a representar a empleados, consumidores e inversores en los tribunales estatales y federales de primera instancia y en los tribunales de apelación. Me gusta ir a los tribunales por mis clientes y he llevado muchos casos con jurado en los tribunales estatales y federales.

¿Ejemplos? En 2010, fui la abogada principal, junto con los otros abogados del bufete, en el caso Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad donde, después de cuatro años de preparación, el bufete obtuvo un veredicto del jurado de 1.670.000 dólares para una empleada afroamericana. En Rivero v. Surdyka, fui el abogado principal en el juicio y la apelación de un caso de derechos civiles que duró 15 años, incluyendo un juicio completo y tres apelaciones al Noveno Circuito, concluyendo finalmente con una sentencia para los demandantes de más de 2.300.000 dólares. Estos casos ilustran el lema del bufete: compromiso – resultados. Hay que comprometerse con un caso, a veces durante mucho tiempo, para obtener el resultado que el cliente merece.

No siempre ganamos en el juicio. Cuando eso ocurre, el compromiso significa llevar el caso al siguiente nivel y recurrirlo. En el caso Rivero, antes mencionado, eso fue lo que ocurrió: el tribunal desestimó el caso -habíamos perdido- pero apelamos y conseguimos una victoria para nuestros clientes que mantuvimos a través de dos apelaciones más. Desde entonces, el bufete ha conseguido muchas victorias en apelación que reivindican los derechos de los empleados y los consumidores.

A lo largo de los años he sido abogado de los demandantes en numerosos casos individuales y acciones colectivas. Puede sonar cursi, o difícil de creer, pero después de todo este tiempo, y después de todas las grandes experiencias que he tenido, mi parte favorita de ser abogado es cuando consigo dar un cheque a mi cliente.

 

Educación

Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de California, Berkeley, J.D., 1986